Broad Street Hockey lists reasons why the Flyers’ 2011-12 season was actually a good one. I agree, I hope Paul Holmgren does too. Still, the team lost, seemed to be hopelessly outplayed by their second round opponent.
Scott Hartnell didn’t blame the rookies:
“I give our young guys a lot of credit. They played with a lot of guts that first series. A few of our young guys were banged up there but they’re still putting on the skates and battling for us. It wasn’t a case of inexperience. I think they were the better team almost every game. It’s frustrating to say, but they played better than us. We’ve got a long summer to think about it.” (from Dave Isaac’s Twitter feed)
I think he’s partly wrong there– inexperience absolutely was a handicap for the Flyers, but that isn’t the same thing as blaming the rookies. They did great, as he pointed out. I argued that they over-achieved, DGS said the team under-achieved, according to predictions he made based on mean scoring to be expected from each player. His numbers were remarkably close to what transpired. Continue reading


